Donguk Lee

 

Passing through the Post-war reconstruction and the Great earthquake, perspective of Japanese creators has been changed in terms of scale.

Figure 1 Tokyo Bay Plan by Kenzo Tange

Scale A. Grand Urban Visions of Metabolism (Seamless connection from human to city)

After the War, numbers of Metabolists in Japan came up with visions of reconstruction. Their initial concepts and master plans were big enough to cover the entire construction of new cities. Even though the realization has been done in relatively small sizes, the projects and plans had strong future implications. For instance, Kisho Kurokawa’s Nakagin Capsule Tower in Tokyo is representing a new form of architecture as in urban scale. From a construction process to final output and afterwards plan, every step was experimental and practical enough to inspire and to change the following massive urban constructions.

 

Figure 2. Small Tokyo: edited by Darko Radović and Davisi Boontharm, was published by Flick Studio and IKI

Scale B. Small and Fragmentized(Characterization of New smallness)

After Japan had quick recovered economy and had built the substantial parts of the cities, the scale of planners had been changed as well. Stabilized society made architects and creators to think more about everyday lives rather than grand infrastructures of cites. The scale of creations has been gradually decreased. Small and fragmentized units of designs, which are much more tangible for humanity, have been evolved lately. Degradation of urban development and shrinking population of Japan also helps the downsizing of objects. And, this new scale phenomenon, ’Smallness’, has been developed profoundly and has symbolized the new urban scale of metropolitan cities in Japan.

Figure 3 [ METABOLISM – The City Of The Future] exhibition] at Mori Art Museum in Roppongi

Scale C. After Earthquake

After earthquake happened, the concept of Metabolism has been arising again. This grand vision of new cities has been refocused. Since the Great Earthquake swept away the entire infrastructures of cities and following earthquake predictions are threating the existing structures, radical envisioning of new cities has been needed. And Metabolism visions are persuasive enough to inspire the new reconstructions.

However, is it an appropriate scale of idea for new cities?

 

Figure 4 ASADAS SCALE - Asada Takashi

Scale D. Continuous Scale

Lastly, I want to refer  ‘ASADAS SCALE’, which is proposed by Asada Takashi. He worked with Kenzo Tange in the Tange Laboratory at Tokyo University. His concept of this scale is to connect every object, which is from a single atom to entire galaxies, into a single loop. After seeing the aftermath of Hiroshima Atomic Bomb, he was shocked by the fact that two single atoms could evaporate the entire city instantly. He had tried to think about the positive use of this instant continuous scale in innovative urban construction. Even though this concept is still in figurative stage, this scale could be valid in terms of reconstruction of disaster affected cities, since it is covering both small everyday lives and large urban envisioning at the same time.

Undisturbed

 Posted by Donguk Lee on April 3, 2012
Apr 032012
 

Undisturbed

What is the border line between volunteerism and tourism indisaster affected area?

 

Visiting Minami-Sanriku gave me a great impression in terms of good energy of local people. People that I met during the trip look very lively and energetic. And substantial volunteerism from all over the world looked positive and helpful for the community.

However, I also sensed a fine line between volunteers and local people. Since there is a strong difference between these two, due to the cultural differences, act of volunteer could be acted as intrusion. There is a necessity of transparency of actions to make volunteerism to be remained in a positive level.

The paper is about the architectural transparency which aims to intervene in the consistently celebrated building. It could give a good inspiration for us to think about certain transparency in the consistently visited area for an opposite meaning.

How much transparency should act of volunteerism maintain in disaster affected area?

 

 

 

Mar 132012
 

Rather than discarding relics we should animate them.

Relic has its own power and beauty.

Two factors, psychological linkage to human and its own physical presence, make itself invaluable.

 

For the first step, I am trying to derive the attachment between disaster relics and affected people in Japan by interview process.

Relic is the man-made concept. We could define this object as relic, since we have used it once before.

Therefore, each object is inevitably tied to personal memories.

If we could be involved within positive parts of memories, the usage of relic could be more valuable than using other new objects.

In this regards, I am in the process of conducting the interview.

 

In terms of second factor of relic, the physical presence,

I think that an appropriate way to extract the beauty of it is to using sound and shape.

Bernhard Leitner / Sound Cube

 

I find out that Bernhard’s sound cube is a good model to be a contrast to relic structure.

This regular hexahedron has speakers within stated intervals.

A flow of energy in this cube would completely proceed within rational prediction.

In contrast, relic model would be sounded in arbitrary way.

 

Red dots are indicating the spots of sounds.

This sound equipments will be implanted in each relic to present a sound wave that is generated by shape of it.

And, I also chose the method of duplication.

A concept of propagation might be the most contradicatable one to the conventional way of treating relic, discarding.

Resemble the natual process of inbreed, I am planning to multiply the same relics to make a monument for disaster affected area.

Mar 062012
 

1. Interview form(draft)

This interview aims to find out a psychological linkage between disaster affected people and physical relics.

All the answers will be critically reflected into the next stage.

Colleagues in Japan will help me to conduct this interview.

 

2. Sound-Shape practice

After interview, one of my methods of using relics is to externalizing the own sound of physical objects.

And this video is showing how the sound of action of destrction(or deconstruction) could be converted to visual shape.

I conduct this process to understand the relationship between object – action – sound.

Oscilloscope is used as an intermediate apparatus between sound and shape.

Feb 282012
 

Debris – Creation

Deconstruction – Destruction

Dead – Alive

Dead, Quiet, Still – Alive, Sound, Move

What we keep – Why we keep – How we keep

Scattered – Algorithm

Revoking Trauma – Infilling Loss

Emotional Attachment to Artificial Debris – Emotional detachment from evaporating relic

Constant accumulation of debris – Sustainable re-usage of debris

 

The main point of my response is to making deconstruction structure by using debris of 3/11 Tsunami. To convert the debris from dead relics to alive sources, I am planning to put sound, movement, algorithm and stories of affected people into debris.

However, this process of debris is standing on a keen line. It could either revoke the trauma or infill the mental loss. I have to make a healing monument rather than hurting trash. Therefore, I am trying to figure out the reason why people build the monument after disasters and the reason why people keep remainders of their dead relatives and so on.

On September 8, 2011, The New York Times published an article, “What We Kept”, which was written about privately kept relics after 9/11. With the pictures of 22 mundane items, the stories of 22 people were published online.

Why do these people have kept these relics? What kind of relics do they have kept? And, how could we expand these relics and attached emotions in a creative and positive way?

Following pictures and stories are parts of articles.

©Tony Cenicola/The New York Times

“I was downtown when the planes hit the towers on Sept. 11. I walked back to Brooklyn over the bridge to where my family and I were living on Sackett Street near the waterfront in Cobble Hill. By the time I got home, the towers had fallen and our neighborhood was littered with papers and debris that had blown across the water from the towers. This is a piece of paper I picked up in the street in front of our house — a Peace Corps application burned around the edges.”

 - Nicholas Arauz

©Tony Cenicola/The New York Times

“I was a New York City police officer and picked up a thin ribbon of metal from the site. I feel kind of dumb because it didn’t occur to me that there were others doing this kind of thing. I didn’t want a ‘souvenir,’ but I wanted something tactile just so I knew it really happened. I like that it is just a piece of scrap to anyone who sees it, not that I display it. I try not to think about it most of the time and something tells me I’m not going to enjoy reading about what others kept, but thank you for helping me not to forget.”

-Dante Messina

©Tony Cenicola/The New York Times

 ”Recovery workers gave these to me while I was volunteering at ground zero. I believe the pin is from a steel beam. There is a fragment of marble, and to me the most disturbing artifact, glass from one of the towers. I do not display these at home. They have been in a drawer for over nine years.”

-  Stephanie Zessos

 

Link to the article: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/08/us/sept-11-reckoning/relics.html?_r=1

02/23 ACT cube

 Posted by Donguk Lee on February 28, 2012
Feb 282012
 

I have tried to define the process of demolished edifices by tsunami as “deconstruction” rather than “destruction”. In my perspective, the biggest difference between these two words is that former one has a final new structure and later one has none.

As a first step for a new creation by using debris of Tsunami, I extracted 40 shapes of relics. And, I created 40 distinctive sounds for each figure.

In February 23rd, I intuitively created numbers of combinations through improvising live performance. By using computed sound controller and image controller, I made numbers of new compositions of relics.

However, I felt deficiency in terms of reflecting stories and contexts of Japan. And, I also met a critical fact that debris could traumatize affected people. But, I believe that artificial relics could heal the people if it used positively and creatively.

 

Feb 202012
 

This timeline mapping project was initiated by SPREAD in April 2011.

It has been 17 years since Great Hanshin earthquake damaged Japan severely. And even before the rehabilitation had been fully finished, the Great East Japan Earthquake hit again.

During these repetitive disasters, people in various creative industries have been responded with their own projects simultaneously and continuously.

This timeline mapping project aims to make a visible archive of those responses to provide an information to artists who are considering or practicing the creative projects for disaster affected society.

This archive is gathering the information and accumulating the projects at the moment with the help of volunteers.

I found this project valuable, since this could help creators in various fields to pick the pinpoints in multiple creative responses and to do the most valid efforts.

 

Link to the project > http://tm19950117.jp/

 

Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake: Aftermath

 Posted by Donguk Lee on February 14, 2012
Feb 142012
 

On January 17th 1995, one of the most infamous Japan earthquakes was happened in Kobe and left 6,425 dead, 25,000 injured and 300,000 displaced. And, it caused a demolition of 100,000 buildings.[1] This earthquake could be considered as a latest disaster in Japan which could be compared with Tohoku earthquake in terms of scale of damage. As the numbers indicate, it caused not only a great number of casualties but also a multitude of broken artifacts.

In post-disaster situation, people in this area have to deal with a great burden of debris to reconstruct the town. It almost took 3 years and 3.2 billion dollars just to clean up the remnants of massive edifices before new construction.[2] As the following chart shows, the volume of debris too big to be easily eradicated.

Table 1. Debris Quantities in Past Events

Year

Event

Debris Volume

Data Source

2011

Tohoku   earthquake

25   mill tones

(Yomiuri, 2011)[2]

2008

Sichuan earthquake

20 mill tones

(Taylor, 2008)[3]

1999

Marmara earthquake

13 mill tones

(Baycan, 2004)[4]

1995

Hanshin-Awaji   earthquake

14.5   mill tones

(Yomiuri, 2011)[2]

 

Not only the debris volume per se but also this chart indicates two more critical crises in post-disaster Japan. Firstly, we have to consider about the gross volume of destruction in Japan. Since this country is located in unstable geographic zone, the Circum-Pacific orogeny, it has been suffered by numbers of frequent earthquakes. And, those result as an excessive volume of debris. But the eradication process of this artificial debris is not sustainable in terms of capacity of nature’s self-purification. Thus the constant collection of debris due to the continuous earthquakes in the country is creating more desperate situation for Japan.

Collapse of Bank Building. ©Tokyo University.

On top of it, we also have to think about a growing physical volume of artificial structures in cities. Since a building technology has been advanced and economic growth has been made, the growing cities have been bulged with higher volume of artifacts than ever before. Consequently, the cities should have to face a bigger volumetric collapse.

In these regards, we could infer that sustainable way of processing debris in post-disaster situation is critical for Japan. Recent article about Tohoku area is already reporting that the reconstruction of this area facing great difficulty because of these excessive artificial detritus. [2]

Because of these reasons, I am getting more convinced with the concept of ‘deconstruction’. Deconstruction is a process of both decomposition and reorganization. It should be separated from the concept of destruction in terms of existence of reassembling. At the moment, our process of debris could be considered more of destruction, since we mostly just clear out the sites after the artifacts have been destroyed.

However, I want to input the notion of deconstruction into the process of debris. With this input of concept, we could possibly find out the better way for post-disaster reconstructions. And this following animation shows a figurative model for deconstruction process that I am conceiving.

 

Deconstruction:

From Decomposed Debris

to Reorganized Structure

 

 

 

 

 

[1] T.R. Reid. 1995. National Geographic. July. 1995.

[2] Yomiuri Shimbun. 2011. Mountains of debris overwhelm Japanese. 04. 17. 2011.

[3] Taylor, A. 2008. Sichuan’s earthquake, six months later. The Boston Globe.

[4] Baycan, F. 2004. Emergency Planning for Disaster Waste: A Proposal based on the experience of the Marmara. Earthquake in Turkey. Coventry. UK.

A thought on disaster

 Posted by Donguk Lee on February 9, 2012
Feb 092012
 

 

Disaster is a failure of artifacts.

When natural disaster happens, artificial structures are retuned to default in terms of conventional intelligence of structural mechanics. Civilian casualties happen when these artifacts could not properly react to the stress of natural event. In perspective of nature, a concept of disaster per se could not be existed. For nature, every event is just part of its own cycle. A notion of disaster is only applicable in the human-made environment.

Disaster could be considered as a point that form and function of human-made objects meet the limitation.

Construction by human – Deconstruction by nature

Scrutinizing remainders after 3/11 Tsunami in Japan, residues of artifacts could be considered as seriously destructed. However, we could see this process as a deconstruction rather than a destruction. Jacques Derrida, a French philosopher, had written about the definition of deconstruction in his mail to his friend in Japan, “To deconstruct was also a structuralist gesture or in any case a gesture that assumed a certain need for the structuralist problematic. But it was also an antistructuralist gesture, and its fortune rests in part on this ambiguity. Structures were to be undone, decomposed, desedimented.”[1]

In this regards, we could consider disaster as a process of destruction of human artifices. Our conventional knowledge of structure has been critically dissolved by the nature for a recomposition.

 

1. Derrida, Jacques [1983] Letter to a Japanese Friend, in Wood, David and Bernasconi, Robert (eds., 1988) Derrida and Différance, Warwick: Parousia, 1985